Dec
1
2009
I'm busy putting together a new currency oriented product and got to thinking about money and art.
In so many ways, we're defined by our relationship with money. How much of it you have, what you do with it and what your attitudes are about it say a lot about who you are as a person. So it's only natural for artists to explore the subject of money in their work - but some artists take the exploration to really provocative and even mind-bending extremes.

I think the most intriguing and original "money artist" may be J.S.G Boggs, a native of New Jersey who travels the world "spending" hand-made drawings as well as, more recently, computer-generated images of paper currency. Though he's become quite well known in the art world and his work is displayed in the Smithsonian, The Art Institute of Chicago and many other places, he prefers to do transactions with merchants who don't realize that a Boggs one-dollar bill could be worth thousands of dollars. He only "spends" the face value of the currency his artwork depicts. Then he goes and sells the receipt and whatever change the merchant may have given him to an art buyer. It's then the art buyer's job to track the merchant down and negotiate a price for the Boggs bill.
How brilliant is that? Representational art meets performance art. This is the kind of stunt Andy Kaufman might have aspired to, but he wasn't nearly this clever or ambitious.
Money origami, or "moneygami," is becoming an art form all its own. Some artists use money to make cute, innocent designs that would seem to clash with the cold, hard world of economics. Others fold and twist currency so that it highlights the face on the bill, then further bend the bill to make a commentary on that face - giving George Washington the pointy ears of a court jester's cap, for example.
For those who think the purpose of art is to pull us out of our everyday assumptions and examine our lives more deeply, money art certainly does the trick. If you make a paper-mache sculpture of a dog with dollar bills, have you wasted money? If you sell it, doesn't the price you set become a part of the statement your art is making? Say you used 200 one dollar bills on the sculpture, and then sold it for $2,000? Or $20? Or exactly $200? The monetary value others place on the work becomes an integral part of the work.
What is money besides paper? And since our currency is no longer backed by gold, isn't the value of that paper a kind of institutionalized illusion? Appreciation of any art requires a suspension of disbelief. Aren't we habitually suspending disbelief by collectively agreeing to give paper and pieces of cheap metal that they don't, objectively, have?
I think what I love about Boggs is that, to me, his work suggests that this institutionalized delusion isn't necessarily a bad thing. There's something charming about the fact that he gets art buyers to scurry all over town looking for some average Joe who agreed to treat a Boggs bill like a real bill. Money can drive people apart and when you look at the world and its history it's not much of a stretch to believe money is the root of all evil. But maybe it's also an everyday symbol of our attempts to unite. Your delusion meets my delusion and, in the process, we achieve a kind of harmony.